Department of Corrections. The “William F. Buckley/Nugatory” tidbit from several days ago elicited responses from several Brandeis-grad friends who remember the event well, in fact, better than me. We all agree that the second word was nugatory, but I have been corrected as to the first: it was not deciduous (in its secondary meaning of ephemeral). It was exiguous. That makes a lot more sense, because exiguous means, well, nugatory (very small in size or amount). I made the correction via an update to the post. Many thanks to Don and Alan! William F. — you can stop spinning in your grave.

Let’s revisit CETE from yesterday, a collection of badgers. LMS took it upon herself to list the group names for all the critters that appeared in the puzzle. These included a raft of otters; a bind of sockeye (salmon); a colony, cauldron, camp, or cloud of bats; and a mischief of rats(!). [I have since learned that a group of woodpeckers is called a descent of woodpeckers. Here’s a lonely one.]

Another commenter added: “There is a wonderful book, amazingly still in print, by the late and sorely missed James Lipton. It is called “An Exaltation of Larks: The Venereal Game.” It tells about the school of knowledge called Venery, in which an educated young man in medieval times was required to know the group names of every known animal. Lipton lists over 500 discrete terms in use during those times. Cete of badgers, pride of lions, murder of crows, exaltation of larks, parliament of owls, and so on. There is also a section of delightfully witty terms Lipton creates for such modern groups as lawyers and psychiatrists.”
Parliament of owls!! I just ordered a copy on eBay for under $6. Can’t wait. If I get obsessed with it, will I have contracted a venereal disease? (As William F. no doubt could have told you, “venery” is defined in this usage as the art of hunting, and/or as the animals that are hunted.)
There was a math clue last Weds that was “Sin is to the y-axis as [blank] is to the x-axis.” And the answer was COS. It triggered the following comments which I enjoyed while not understanding a word:
First, Anonymous posted: As someone who professionally uses and teaches geometry, I have no clue what the “sin:y-axis :: cos:x-axis” is supposed to mean. Does the clue refer to the conversion from polar to cartesian coordinates for a vector? That is such a narrow definition that it’s incomprehensible. I get that, in crosswords, “any” valid definition is allowed, but in math, you have to specify appropriate conditions. It is just as common for the sin to be the X-axis value and cos to be the Y-axis value that this clue just leaves me thinking in circles.
TTrimble replied: This refers to the definition of trigonometric functions as “circular functions”: we define cos(t) as the x-coordinate of the point on the unit circle (centered at the origin) that is obtained by starting from the point (1, 0) and then traversing the circle through an arc of length t, proceeding in the counterclockwise direction. We correspondingly define sin(t) as the y-coordinate of that point. Hence cos(t) is a measurement along the x-axis, and sin(t) is a measurement along the y-axis. This is a completely standard definition, and it is the preferred standard in mathematics courses everywhere, or at least in courses that aim toward a calculus-based study of the trigonometric functions. Using that standard, I think the clue is fine.
Anonymous came back with: Fair enough, this is a common standard, but the clue still doesn’t fit: cos(t) is the x coordinate value, not the x-axis. So sin:y :: ______ 😡 or sin:y-value :: cos:x-value would be appropriate, but equating the axis to the value projected onto that axis would not.
That’s where it ended. [Judy — you following this?]
Yesterday’s puzzle contained the clue “Question asked without reservation?” and the answer was IS THIS SEAT TAKEN? It led to a mini-rant on “seat saving” in an LMS comment: “I don’t have the balls to be That Person who shows up early at an event to drape coats, sweaters, etc. over the backs of like 12 seats to save them for friends who’re getting there later. This just doesn’t seem fair. And when I see others do it, I get really nervous and upset that some kind of fight’s gonna ensue. I mean, c’mon. It’s your kid’s graduation and you get there at a reasonable time only to find all the good seats covered in apparel, saved for aunts and cousins who chose not to arrive at a reasonable time. Even though I have no dog in that fight, I hate the spectacle, dread the (justified) confrontations.”
My commute to/from NYC includes an NJ Transit train ride between Chatham NJ and Penn Station NY. I almost always get a seat, but the coup is to get a pair of seats all to yourself. Some people stack the deck in their favor by either sitting in the outside seat or placing a bag or something on one of the seats. I was boarding a train in NY once and it was going to be especially crowded. I think the earlier train was canceled. By the time I entered the car, there was at least one person in each of the double seats. I had to decide whom to bother (by plunking my tuchas down next to him or her). The first woman I looked at had “doubled up” on preserving her two-seater: that is, she both sat on the outside and loaded up the inside seat with bags. No way I was going to breach those defenses. But there was a nice-seeming middle-aged African-American gentleman sitting right behind her, and when I said “Excuse me,” he happily rose to allow me to claim the seat next to him. I settled in comfortably and we both watched the extraordinary entertainment that soon took place right in front of us.
First, one guy came by and asked the woman “Is that seat taken?” and she said, “Yes, I’m saving it for my husband.” A moment later it happened again, and she said, “My husband will be here soon, I’m saving it for him.” The car was filling up now so it became pretty rapid-fire: “Can I sit there?” “No, I’m saving it for my husband. No, — . . . husband. No, — . . . saving it.” It was like a hockey goalie flicking away shot after shot, maybe seven or eight times in pretty rapid succession. Finally this happened:
“Can I sit there?”
“No, I’m saving the seat for my husband.”
“You can’t do that – there’s no saving seats here.”
“He texted me. He’s on his way.”
“Nuh-uh, you can’t save seats. I left my husband in the other car — you can’t save seats.”
Then another woman who was standing nearby chimed in — “She’s right, you can’t save seats here.”
“But he’ll be here any second, I’m not giving up this seat.”
“If he’s not here now, that seat is open. I’m claiming that seat.”
With that, the seated woman finally caved in. “OK,” she said, “you can have the seat.” And she took the bags off of it and stood to allow the other woman to sit down. Hrummmph!
Early on, I wondered if in fact she might have made up the husband just to keep that seat for herself. Did she really want that double seat so badly? But I didn’t think she’d go that far. And I was right about that because the final act was about to take place. The husband showed up.
“You didn’t save me a seat!!”
“I tried to — I couldn’t.”
“You said you’d save me a seat!”
“I know — I tried to.
“I gave up a seat in the back to come here!”
“I know, but I couldn’t save it.”
“I rushed thru the crowd — you said you had a seat saved!”
“I know, but I couldn’t hold it.”
And he stormed off in a huff. I must say, when he showed up and said “You didn’t save me a seat!” both the Black guy next to me and I barely held off bursting into laughter. Priceless. That was the best ride home.
I quit Netflix a few months ago when the price went up to $16.99 a month and I realized I wasn’t watching anything they offered. Since then, I have been inundated with emails begging me to return at a reduced rate. Just now I got one offering it for just $6.99. I’ll have to think about that. It’s nice to feel loved.
Today’s puzzle was called Fan Club and the theme is about phrases that can be read to mean “favoring.” And the clues are mostly made-up words ending in “philes.” So, e.g., for the phrase LIKE CLOCKWORK, the clue was “Chronomechanophiles. . . ” Those are people who “like” (enjoy) clockwork. Get it? It was a decent enough puzzle to work through, but doesn’t offer much blog fodder.
12A was “Squeeze, as a mop,” with the answer WRING, and one fellow wondered if someone who was excellent at that would be Lord of the Wrings. (Ouch.)
And 79D was well-clued: “Announcement of a split decision?” Answer: DEAR JOHN.
I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention two actresses who visited the grid today: REESE Witherspoon and GENA Rowlands. Welcome ladies! Please help yourselves to some ESTEE Lauder products at 19D before you go, and grab a six-pack of PBR, right over there at 33A.



Burp!

















































