We went to the Symphony yesterday (the New Jersey Symphony in Newark). They opened with Beethoven’s Eggplant Overture (tee hee), but the highlight was a modern piece by Aaron Jay Kernis, born 1/15/60: his Symphony No. 2 (1991).
Its theme is the horror of war — in particular modern technological war as waged in the Gulf War. If you can capture it in sound, he did. I noticed at several points that the harpist had her hands over her ears, and, later, I saw members of the string section taking earplugs out of theirs. The power of the music was provided in part by a percussion section that required four players on the following “battery:” snare drum, piccolo and high snare drum, tenor drum, small and large bass drum, medium log drum, brake drum, bongos, congas, wood blocks, reco reco, lead pipe, mounted handbells, cowbells, thunder sheet, crotales, cabasa, small and high triangles, China boy cymbal, small, medium and large cymbals, small and medium crash cymbals, ride cymbal, vibraphone, xylophone, glockenspiel, marimba, chimes, medium and large tam tams, and tom toms. (I copied that list directly off of the program notes: I didn’t make up the items such as lead pipe or cabasa (which sounds like a melon), as some of you may have thought.) Here are a cabasa and a reco reco (scraper):


Among his many awards, Kirnis won the Pulitzer Prize and Grammys. His Lament and Prayer for Orchestra (1996) commemorated the 50th anniversary of the Holocaust. At the conclusion of the performance of the Second Symphony, the conductor, Hugh Wolff, motioned to the boxes to the left of the stage. Kirnis was in attendance. The work premiered in Newark back in 1992, with Wolff conducting the NJ Symphony then as well.

[Note: The above is an example of how someone who is utterly ignorant about music (i.e., me) can write a few paragraphs on the subject.]
And, speaking of utter ignorance – welcome to the 50th post to appear on owl-chatter.com! I had absolutely no idea what it would be like when I started. And I pretty much still don’t. To my two or three readers — thanks for stopping by! Let’s take a look at today’s puzzle now.
Like me, you may have been unclear on the distinction between rabbits and hares. Well, for one thing, as the clue for 50 down states: “Unlike rabbits,” HARES’ “young are born open-eyed and hopping.” This was posted as a comment on Rex: “Rabbits nest below ground, the young are altricial, and when they run from you, they’ll run to cover and hide. Hares nest above ground, the young are precocial, and when they run they’ll just flat out run.”
Altricial means born helpless and requiring substantial parental care. Precocial means born in an advanced state and able to feed itself and move about independently almost immediately. Below is first a hare, and next a rabbit.


Delighted to see a big fat tuchas plop right down at 9D (ASS, “beast of burden”), right on top of SASS, and crossing CABOOSE! And if that’s not enough for you rear-enders, 51D is clued “Get Yer [blank] Out!” with the answer YA-YAS, the title of a Rolling Stones album. Well, one Rex comment today notes: “I wondered about the origin of ‘Get Yer Ya-Yas Out’ and it comes from a Blind Boy Fuller song where he tells someone to get out of his house or he’ll ‘throw your ya-yas’ out the door. And “ya-yas” means ASS.”
I was not able to confirm this meaning of ya-yas via Google, but so what?
The SAN ANDREAS FAULT (i.e., those words: not the thing itself) crosses the entire grid in the center. A Californian noted that it does not actually pass through the town of San Andreas, CA. Inhabitants like to say “It’s not our fault.”
The Fault runs for 750 miles and forms the boundary between tectonic plates. It runs mostly up California, but extends into Mexico too. The plates are moving in different directions which is “creating significant compressional forces,” meaning essentially “we’re f**ked.” The compression helps form mountain ranges, but also leads to earthquakes with the next one expected to hit the LA region at some indeterminate point in the future. Here’s a range rising above LA.

On the subject of devastation, there was a good New Yorker cartoon not too long ago. It had one of those gaunt, prophet-type fellows holding up his sign: The End Is Near. But we were viewing the sign reflected in the side view mirror of a car. And the sign said: The End Is Nearer Than It Appears.
Welcome to The Hall of Fame, Fred McGriff! What the hell took you so long, Crime Dog? In addition to hitting 493 home runs (the same exact amount as fellow first baseman Lou Gehrig), McGriff has the great nickname “Crime Dog,” from commercials featuring a crime-preventing cartoon dog named McGruff. From ’88 through ’97, McGriff hit the most home runs in major league baseball, if you don’t count the steroid-inflated numbers of Bonds and McGwire.

When I first started collecting baseball autographs in high school my goal was to obtain as many Hall of Famers as I could. So I try to add new members to my collection unless the cost would be prohibitive (e.g., Jeter and Mariano Rivera). McGriff’s was a gaping hole in my collection, which I remedied by picking one up on eBay this morning for not too unreasonable an amount. I look forward to passing the collection on to my grandchildren one day, none of whom is likely to have the slightest interest in it.

The James Lipton book on the venery of animals came in (i.e., what groups of animals are called): An Exaltation of Larks (the ultimate edition, with over 1,000 terms). In the intro, Lipton admits he is not the first to undertake the task, and he quotes this passage from Arthur Conan Doyle, from his non-Holmesian writing.
Answer me now, lad, how would you say if you saw ten badgers in the forest?
A cete of badgers, fair sir.
Good, Nigel — good, by my faith! And if you walk in Woolmer Forest and see a swarm of foxes, how would you call it?
A skulk of foxes.
And if they lions?
Nay, fair sir, I am not like to meet several lions in Woolmer Forest.
Ay, lad, but there are other forests besides Woolmer, and other lands besides England, and who can tell how far afield such a knight errant as Nigel of Tilford may go, when he sees worship to be won? We will say that you were in the deserts of Nubia, and that afterward at the court of the great Sultan you wished to say that you had seen several lions. How then would you say it?
Surely, fair sir, I would be content to say that I had seen a number of lions, if indeed I could say aught after so wondrous an adventure.
Nay, Nigel, a huntsman would have said that he had seen a pride of lions, and so proved that he knew the language of the chase. Now, had it been boars instead of lions?
One says a singular of boars.
And if they be swine?
Surely, it is a herd of swine.
Nay, nay, lad, it is indeed sad to see how little you know. No man of gentle birth would speak of a herd of swine; that is the peasant speech. If you drive them it is a herd. If you hunt them it is other. Can you tell us, Mary?
Surely, sweet sir, one talks of a sounder of swine.
The old Knight laughed exultantly. Here is a pupil who never brings me shame! Hark ye! only last week that jack-fool, the young Lord of Brocas, was here talking of having seen a covey of pheasants in the wood. One such speech would have been the ruin of a young squire at the court. How would you have said it, Nigel?
Surely, fair sir, it should be a nye of pheasants.
Good, Nigel — a nye of pheasants, even as it is a gaggle of geese or a badling of ducks, a fall of woodcock or a wisp of snipe. But a covey of pheasants! What sort of talk is that?
Apparently, we have a shitload of work ahead of us. That’s enough for today though.




























































